Monday, July 9, 2012

Niceville, by Carsten Stroud (Knopf; $26.95)


Something is definitely not nice in Niceville. Ten-year-old Rainey Teague disappeared while walking home from school one day. It’s not the first missing persons case the town has known. In fact, the town has a stranger-abduction rate more than five times that of the rest of the country. Two per year since 1928, to be exact.

Rainey’s disappearance is only one of many, many ugly occurrences in the pretty little town. The local bank gets robbed, and a sniper picks off each of the cops chasing the escape car.  Along with the bank’s $2.5 million, the robbers swiped a top-secret piece of equipment previously stolen from a local Raytheon subsidiary. A prominent citizen films his adolescent daughters in the shower.   And mirrors and windows reflect something evil.

The sleepy southern town was built against Tallulah’s Wall, a forbidding-looking cliff that serves as the northern border. Locals think that the town’s problems might stem from Crater Sink, an ominous, bottomless sinkhole at the top of the wall. Readers realize early on—far, far earlier than the characters do, that the true source of the problem is time travel gone seriously awry.

Carsten Stroud is an amazing talent.  His writing is elegant, his setting fabulously ominous, and his characters refreshingly unique.  He describes one couple as being “as frigidly unappealing as banana-flavored Popsicles.”  About Tin Town, Niceville’s slum, Stroud said, “the main industry ruling the place was a lethal combination of grinding hard times, blood-simple gunsels, pointless death, and blue ruin.” (I’m not sure what “blue ruin” is, but I liked the phrase.) Despite his skill—or rather, because of it—I ultimately found Niceville infuriating.  The problem? The plot is a hot mess. There are too many story lines, and Stroud does not bother to weave them together.  Characters are thrown in the mix in a way that implies they’ll somehow impact the plot; too often, they have no effect at all. When one character takes action to destroy another, Stroud writes, “the fact that he was, in effect, about to commit a kind of suicide was not clear to him at the time.”  Set-ups of that sort deserve resolution equal to the drama of the language; the fact that the character was alive and well at the end of the book left me scratching my head.  The supernatural aspect of the plot is not compelling and the climax of that story line incomprehensible. Stroud is careless and sloppy.  In the mystery world, those are capital crimes.

I couldn’t put this book down, but when it was done, I wanted to stomp it into dust.  It’s a great read with an outstandingly unsatisfying ending.


No comments:

Post a Comment